Rosemarie Trockel is an artist’s artist and although I’m not
an artist, I am a huge fan of her work and that makes the disappointment of her
current exhibition at the New Museum even more awkward. Rosemarie Trockel: A
Cosmos, is a three-floored exhibition,
including some stairways, and it is a mini-retrospective in some ways. It formulates itself as a survey not
only of her own work but also of her influences. It is within the formulation that the failures occur and
most surprisingly in the arrangement, display and general installation, which
you think would not be the biggest issues when a museum is the presenter.
Throughout the show, which is curated by Lynne Cooke in
collaboration with Trockel and with additional support by Massimilano Gioni and
Jenny Moore, there are systems of seeing and of contextualizing that hark on
ways of presentation found in science, academia, and other forms of
institutionalized display. This
reliance on these methods inadvertently, or possibly advertently, sucks out
much of the magic and the humor that makes Trockel so formidable in her own
influence. This technique was
first seen on the fourth floor which is oddly the way shows start, from the top
down. Here there are a collection
of zines, books, pamphlets and drawings by Trockel that ranged from 1980s to
the 2000s and they are a fine selection to view as they show her wit and her
unhinged imagination with words, images and quick release of both. The somber display of a considered
height with a slight slant to the shelf with a painted brown back runner and
clear acrylic case, was highly practical yet sufficiently dull. Display of such materials always seems
to be problematic at best but there was something notable in the full embrace
of that tendency for failure here.
Also, the use of books, as a tool of subversion but also as a tool of
authority to the artist and to the contents and gestures, made heavy imprint in
the way the rest of the show could be viewed.
The rest of this floor has some very nice sculptures in
ceramics with fantastic glazes, like platinum, as well as the use of furniture
as sculpture. The ceramics are
hung mostly on the wall and they are great to see but they seem lost and somehow
just arranged in an unimagined way.
The sofa sculpture and the platform with fabric draped over seems off in
contrast with the ceramics, it’s like a home furniture display that forgot the
big ticket items. This odd lacking
of something carries throughout the exhibit including the third floor that has
Trockel’s knit canvases. She is well known for these yarn paintings and these
are always wonderful to see in real life as the tactility and hues of them are
as engaging as the concepts behind them.
The selection is a bit uneven and it feels as if they had to work with
only what was available versus what may be the best. The works that have unknit
yarn stretched over the stretcher bars to create a minimalist string painting
were notably uninspiring. In addition
to Trockel’s work, this floor also included the work of Judith Scott, an
outsider artist who makes wrapped abstract forms out of yarn, string and other
fabric remnants. Her work is very-very good regardless of her labeling and the
inclusion of many strong works by her is fitting but the combination of Scott’s
and Trockel’s yarn works in the same room as it was installed felt like a
hindrance to both women. Also,
Scott’s pieces were so strong it almost seemed to suck the light away from
Trockel’s.
The finale on the second floor seemed to be the brain of the
show. Here the “cosmology” of
Trockel’s influences converges in addition to some of her more stellar
pieces. One method of this
display recalls the fourth floor’s old timey scientific display, which mixes
Trockel’s own curiosities of flora and fauna with those wonderfully detailed
naturalism illustrations. The systems of categorizing, labeling and ordering
through the scientific methodologies of the past are heavily emphasized. This again brings to point the act of
legitimizing, of giving the author, in this case Trockel, authority over her
subject, or the ideas behind the visuality of it. This is in no way a fault but there is something too transparent
in the act that lacks surprise to any degree. In the other side of this floor are large rectangular clear
boxes that act as curios of her influences that range from spectacular outsider
artists like James Castle and Morton Bartlett to contemporaries and nearly
forgotten aesthetic compatriots.
The objects are interesting; the gathering of them impressive but again
the display seems to vacuum seal any life away. It is not all terrible though, within the suite of collected
specimens there are standouts, one in particular, a large crab on top of a
clear box that has her signature fabric patterns, is one the best objects
around. This is the problematic
aspect of this entire show. There are so many incredible pieces but somehow not
arranged in a way that lets them act that way.
This is a show that has all the components for a fabulously
successful exhibition. The work is
there; the ideas are there, the timing is just right, as Trockel’s name and
influence has been in resurgence over the past few years. She is a fantastic, smart, worthy to be
recognized artist who will continue to be an artists’ artist so the concern of
her legacy is not tainted. But, it
is incredibly frustrating to see all these good parts, all the makings of a
show that could re-spark or introduce for the first time her work to a new
generation. The show did not fail
so much as just fizzle away into dullness.
I love Trockel’s work, her punk attitude, but if I hadn’t already and
this was my first dose, I would have just blinked the whole show away. The show’s overall structure is smart
and makes more then perfect sense with Trockel’s art and life, it does
invigorate many of the most important things about her own work and hopefully
next time this is presented or re-imagined there will be a balance of the
formulas with the aesthetics, because if one thing is for certain about
Trockel, it is that she makes wonderful things to look at and to puzzle out
what it all means.